Outsourcing justice?

Article published on May 29, 2006
Article published on May 29, 2006

This article has not been vetted by an editor at Paris HQ

In response to growing media reports on illegal CIA prisons in Eastern Europe and European airports being used for secret flights, the European Parliament set up a commission to investigate. They were astonished by what they discovered

Khaled al-Masri claims to have been seeing a lot of Europe lately. And it hasn’t been through going on holiday. Mr Masri, a German citizen, says he was seized by the CIA in Macedonia. He claims he was beaten, drugged and flown to a CIA prison in Afghanistan. The CIA then released him close to where he says he was abducted in what they acknowledge was a case of mistaken identity.

Mr Masri is not alone. In 2005, the Washington Post first reported that the CIA had ‘black sites’ in Eastern Europe; secret interrogation centres where subjects have been alleged to have been tortured. Since then there have been a series of reports that European airports have been used for ‘extraordinary renditions.’ In an extraordinary rendition, terror suspects are sent for interrogation in third countries, where they have no legal protection or rights under American law. In response, a European Parliamentary committee has been set up to probe these allegations. The results could have an impact on the EU-US relationship, and erode Europe’s position as a protector of human rights.

Hunting planes

One of the MEP’s on the committee is Dutch MEP Sophia in 't Veld. The picture of the affair they have built up is “astounding,” she says. “It appears that the US has had carte blanche regarding intelligence operations in the EU ever since 9-11.” In its draft report, the committee builds up a picture of more than 1,000 secret flights flown over EU soil.

So what are the legal implications? According to Eurocontrol, the European flight organisation, the plane used for the alleged abduction of al-Masri flew from Kabul to Poland and Romania and then onto the detention facility in Guatanamo. It is secret flights like this, argues Claudio Fava, the Italian MEP who authored the Committee’s first report, which means European government are breaching their obligations under international law, which requires flights to declare their route, destination and the names of their passengers.

Furthermore, the EU member states are signatories of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). In ‘t Veld explains that “in the war on terror, Europe and the US share information. But when the US gathers intelligence through torture and then shares it with EU member states, it makes us complicit and in violation of these treaties.”

Eyes wide shut

While the EU commission has been up in arms about the affair, individual governments have been more reticent about providing information. In April 2006, Macedonia’s interior minister dismissed as mere speculation the idea al-Masri was abducted from his country. Trying to find out about bilateral relations with the US has proved difficult. For while national parliamentary inquiries are now under way in the UK, Belgium and Sweden, governments have been reluctant to share information with the committee. “The problem is that foreign policy is still a national matter,” says In 't Veld.

In the case of Holland, In 't Veld explains, “it is well known that planes that landed at Schiphol Airport have also been spotted in Guantanamo, Libya and Egypt. These places are linked to the torture of detainees. So why were these planes in Amsterdam? In response to our questions the Dutch government gave us official statements regarding ‘the co-ordinated effort in the war on terror.’ It seems to me that the Dutch government has a completely misplaced trust in the operations of the Americans.”

With regards to the black sites, In 't Veld says that the committee has not been able to prove their existence. But she continues: “the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, recently stated: these black sites exist, we know of disappeared detainees, we don't know where they are. They are held in unknown places so by definition, these 'black-sites' exist.”

I'm shocked, shocked that this kind of thing takes place

Much of Europe is horrified by what is being discovered. An Italian court has issued Europe-wide arrest warrants for 22 supposed CIA suspects purportedly involved in abducting Abu Omar, a cleric seized, without Italian permission, in 2003. Roberto Castelli, the former Italian Justice Minister, refused an extradition request for the agents last month.

The horrified response of the European governments should be taken with a large pinch of salt. In ‘t Veld explains, “they knew what was going on, and if they didn’t they are completely incompetent! Look at the case of Abu Omar, an Egyptian who was abducted, tortured and then released. He was being shadowed by the Italian secret service for some time and then was suddenly arrested in Milan by 25 CIA agents! Surely the Italians must have known what the CIA was up to!” The Council of Europe report by Dick Marty has also concluded that European governments knew about the secret prison flights and Colin Powell has recently said that the Europeans are being disingenuous when claiming not to know about the flights.

A rabid dog on a long leash

Jans Wiersma, a Dutch MEP working on the committee, explains that what shocked him is not so much “what the Americans have undertaken but the willingness from the European side to assist them without questioning all the means that are used.” The committees interim draft report claims that there was not just isolated violation of human rights but “rather a widespread regular practice, in which the majority of European countries were involved,” Mr Fava was quoted as saying.

The final report of the committee is due in January, but whatever the results, the affair already has profound implications for Europe. At what point does Europe’s allegiance to America stop? The European efforts around the world to improve the human rights records of other countries may soon have a hollow ring…