“Now is the time that the Barroso Commission should act”

Article published on Feb. 7, 2005
community published
Article published on Feb. 7, 2005

This article has not been vetted by an editor at Paris HQ

MEPs and women’s rights campaigners Lissy Gröner and Pia Locatelli reveal their thoughts on the possible entry of Turkey into the EU

The debate on Turkish accession to the EU has stirred up fears about the impact the entry of such a populous country with a largely different history and cultural make-up could have on the EU. There is no denying the legitimacy of some of the concerns raised in the debate, in particular the failure of Turkey to guarantee the protection of its citizens’ human rights; above all those of women. Two of those to have raised these concerns are German MEP Lissy Gröner, member of the European Parliament’s Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality, and Italian MEP Pia Locatelli, President of the NGO Socialist International Women.

Recognising the problem

Gröner describes women’s rights as a ‘key issue’ for her, which has a definite impact on her stance on Turkish accession to the EU. Like Locatelli, she was in favour of opening negotiations with Ankara, but insists that the country has a lot to do before it can be considered as part of the European Union. “It’s not guaranteed that because negotiations have been opened, the result is ‘yes’to Turkish entry” says Gröner. “Turkey has done a lot to implement the Copenhagen criteria. But the Copenhagen criteria also mean full implementation of democracy, and there is not full democracy if women’s rights are not fully implemented.” Locatelli is a little more positive in pointing out that ”At least now the existence of violence against women is admitted by Turkish society, when some years ago was not considered as a problem.”

One of the principal problems as far as Gröner is concerned is the absence of a political voice for Turkish women, although there are female politicians and there was even a female Prime Minister from 1993-95. Locatelli goes some way to explaining this phenomenon:”I recall a conversation I had many years ago with Turkan Akyol, former Turkish Minister for Women. She told me that it is very difficult to reach women because of the different situations and mentalities that you find in Turkey. It is a country of contradictions.” Now the European Parliament has set itself the task of establishing how well the rights of women (such as the right to mental and physical integrity, to liberty and security, to freedom of expression and the right to choice in marriage) are protected. A delegation of MEPs will be in the country in February meeting women and politicians with the aim of drafting a report on the reality in Turkey. On paper, women’s rights in Turkey are now exemplary. The task of the Parliament delegation is to establish whether this is the case in reality. In some areas, particularly those where Sharia law is still used, this seems unlikely.

Should the EU act?

But is it the role of the EU to monitor women’s rights in Turkey, or even within the EU’s current Member States? Gröner believes so. She cites the forthcoming EU constitution: “There may not be a specific article on violence against women, but I think the references to citizens’ rights and the Charter on Citizens’ Rights give the EU institutions scope for intervention.” However, the European Parliament is not about to wait until the ratification of the Constitution to protect women’s rights. In November, the socialists in the Parliament launched an action plan on violence against women, applicable both inside and outside the EU. The plan, headed by Gröner, makes five demands on the Commission: binding policies to combat all forms of violence against women and to protect women’s rights; comprehensive statistics on violence suffered by women in the EU; a campaign for zero tolerance of violence against women; the designation of 2006 as a European year of action to combat violence against women; and development of the EU’s Daphne II programme, which supports organisations seeking to prevent violence against children, young people and women. “We formulated this action plan because I think now is the time that the Barroso Commission should act,” says Gröner. “We’ve had resolutions, we’ve had debates in Parliament, but ultimately the question of violence against women is not high enough on the political agenda.”

Indeed, Turkey is not the only country with questionable women’s rights. Gröner is keen to emphasise that Turkey should not be singled out for bad practice – women there are better integrated into the economy than in some current EU Member States, and they are well represented at university, she says. “We will name and blame if necessary,” she adds, referring to the 25 EU member states. But despite the EU’s mixed record on women’s rights, Gröner believes that Turkey’s aspiration to join the club has already led to improvements for its women. “Let’s hope that Turkey will join the EU if it means the improvement of conditions for Turkish women and the guarantee of human rights. It is true that Turkey has a high strategic importance for the European Union. It could represent a political and cultural bridge towards the Islamic Middle East” Locatelli concludes.